US moves captured tanker captain and first officer from UK waters

The Marinera, previously known as Bella 1, was seized on 7 January off the coast of Iceland and moved to the Moray Firth in the Scottish Highlands.

Oil tanker Marinera. Pic: Reuters
Image: Oil tanker Marinera. Pic: Reuters
Why you can trust Paste BN

The captain and first officer of a Venezuela-linked oil tanker captured by American forces have been taken out of UK territory by the US Coast Guard, a court has been told.

The Russian-flagged Marinera, previously known as Bella 1, was seized on 7 January off the coast of Iceland and moved to the Moray Firth in the Scottish Highlands.

On Monday, lawyers acting for Natia Dzadzama, wife of the vessel's captain Avtandil Kalandadze, lodged a petition with the Court of Session in Edinburgh seeking an emergency order to prevent the ship and those on board being removed from the jurisdiction of the Scottish court.

Avtandil Kalandadze, captain of the Marinera, and his wife, Natia Dzadzama. Pic: Aamer Anwar & Co
Image: Avtandil Kalandadze, captain of the Marinera, and his wife, Natia Dzadzama. Pic: Aamer Anwar & Co

In a late-night hearing, Lord Young granted an interim interdict prohibiting the Advocate General for Scotland, the Lord Advocate and Scottish ministers - or anyone acting on their behalf - from removing the captain and the crew of the Marinera from the territorial jurisdiction of the court.

However, Lord Young recalled the order on Tuesday, having heard the captain and first officer had already left UK waters.

Avtandil Kalandadze and his family. Pic: Aamer Anwar & Co
Image: Avtandil Kalandadze and his family. Pic: Aamer Anwar & Co
Get Paste BN on WhatsApp
Get Paste BN on WhatsApp

Follow our channel and never miss an update

Tap here to follow

Solicitor General Ruth Charteris KC, representing Lord Advocate Dorothy Bain KC and Scottish ministers, told the court: "The captain and the first officer are now aboard the US Coast Guard vessel Munro and have departed the United Kingdom's territorial sea.

"This was thought to be the position last night, although I entirely appreciate the information before your lordship was not certain.

More on Russia

"However, we received an email from the Department of Justice at 3.04 this morning confirming that that is absolutely the position, so in short they are no longer within the territorial jurisdiction of this court."

Read more:
Tracking oil tanker's attempt to escape seizure by the US

The court, sitting virtually, heard how the remaining 26 crew members have left the ship and have been processed at the army reserve centre in Inverness.

Ms Charteris said, according to Police Scotland, none of them have claimed asylum.

Five wish to travel to the US and 21 want to travel elsewhere, the court heard.

Ms Charteris said the group were staying at a hotel in Elgin, Moray, and "it is hoped that they can proceed with their plans to return to their homes".

What we found tracking seized oil tanker

Be the first to get Breaking News

Install the Paste BN app for free

The Solicitor General said Scottish ministers and the Lord Advocate have never at any point detained the crew, captain or first officer and have never had them in their control, and no individual has been arrested or detained by any Scottish authority.

She said Lord Advocate Ms Bain received a request for mutual legal assistance issued by US authorities on 16 January, which was granted subject to specific assurances and conditions to ensure the safety and wellbeing of the crew.

She said it was a key requirement of this that all 28 were to be brought ashore to Scotland.

However, the request for mutual legal assistance was withdrawn on Sunday and confirmed in writing the following day, meaning there was nothing the Lord Advocate or Scottish ministers could do about the situation.

Mr Kalandadze and Ms Dzadzama. Pic: Aamer Anwar & Co
Image: Mr Kalandadze and Ms Dzadzama. Pic: Aamer Anwar & Co

Solicitor Aamer Anwar, who is acting on behalf of Ms Dzadzama, said the captain and first officer were "whisked away under the cover of darkness".

He said their removal from Scottish jurisdiction "could not have occurred without the knowledge and cooperation of United Kingdom authorities".

Mr Anwar added: "The timing of these removals is particularly troubling.

"They occurred at the same time as a hearing at which the court considered the extent to which a foreign state might claim immunity from interim interdict.

"That immunity is not absolute, a position supported by Supreme Court authority and relied upon in submissions lodged with the court."